Court Case Schema #3080
cordblomquist
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 2 comments
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
-
|
I'm not familiar with the specifics of Louisiana law, but I think we could make a standard that accommodates nearly any adversarial legal system where two parties comes together to debate a point of law, have representation, appear before a judge or mediator, appear in a specific court or other venue, etc. In US law these cases would be title with the two parties, like "Marbury vs. Madison," but the title of the case could be whatever works in the local jurisdiction. Other relevant data would include referring court, other cases cited, date a case was granted, date heard, and date decided. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Court cases/decisions don't fit well into existing schema but they are a hugely important topic.
Case law is part of the legal system in at least 40 countries including Australia, Bangladesh, Canada, India, Ireland, Israel, Nepal, New Zealand, Pakistan, the United Kingdom, and Uganda, so this standard wouldn't just be focused on U.S. law. A standard that were inclusive and generalized enough would probably cover the legal systems governing over 2 billion people.
Cases aren't Legislation, so it doesn't make sense to use that type of CreativeWork.
They are somewhat like Events in that they are decided on a particular day and each person involved is a contributor, but each person involved has a more specific role like petitioner, respondent, advocate, or judge/justice.
Look at how a typical U.S. Supreme Court case, Muller v. Oregon, is represented in three popular case databases, Oyez, Justia, and Cornell Law School. Oyez is the most structured, but that structure isn't represented in structured data at all, probably because there's not an adequate way of doing so right now.
How does one start to develop a standard like this? I am totally new helping out the structured data community, but I have worked with structured data in website projects for several years. The work I'm doing now lends itself to this, so I could consult with relevant experts (in the United States) to help along such a process.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions