Delete danbri directory #4636
Merged
Delete danbri directory #4636
+0
−365
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
@alex-jansen @MatthiasWiesmann apologies - I was testing Claude Code's view of the repo and I missed the counter intuitive behaviour where PRs to a fork get routed upstream. It was 3 added files, I'll just nuke them in place.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR removes an accidentally created test directory (danbri/) containing study notes that were generated while testing Claude Code's repository analysis. The author acknowledges this was created due to unexpected PR routing behavior when working with a fork.
Key Changes
- Deletion of the
danbri/claudefile containing auto-generated repository study notes
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
MatthiasWiesmann
approved these changes
Dec 11, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@alex-jansen @MatthiasWiesmann apologies - I was testing Claude Code's view of the repo and I missed the counter intuitive behaviour where PRs to a fork get routed upstream. It was 3 added files, I'll just nuke them in place.